On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 14:01 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: > Andre Klapper wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 16:53 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > > > My gut feeling was that I'd want .92 back but I have now looked at the > > > schedule and it makes sense to have .5 after GUADEC, and I wouldn't > > > want to squeeze too many releases after that. > > > > > > Effectively I'm not sure decoupling the freeze would work effectively, > > > I would keept it paired to .90. > > > > Bleh, I guess we should finalize this really soon now. > > > > Though it would mean 4 weeks of no release around GUADEC, I propose to > > * drop 3.13.5 and introduce 3.13.92 > > * w21 Aug18 3.13.90 The Freeze > > * w23 Sep01 3.13.91 String Freeze > > * w25 Sep15 3.13.92 Hardcode Freeze > > Works for me. > > > Need to edit releng/tree/tools/schedule/3.14.schedule in Git once I'm > > back on a machine with my SSH key; anybody feel free to be faster.
Thanks! I've created https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointThirteen and posted schedule as a "draft" there; still need to create ical file and copy over; plus announce it to mailing lists. Maybe we should just drop the "draft" as we're late already anyway? andre (need to run, hence didn't finish all this yet) -- Andre Klapper | [email protected] http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
