Am Montag, 18. Juni 2007 schrieb Stephan Kulow: > Am Monday 18 June 2007 schrieb Tom Albers: > > Op zo 17 jun 2007 03:31 schreef u: > > > On Sunday 17 June 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > ok, the question is if we can deliver what a user expects from a > > > > beta, a complete desktop with some small bugs. > > > > > > give me a moment to recover from laughing. > > > > > > whew.. ok. so. the question is whether the user expectations are > > > unrealistic and we don't care or whether we should try and pander to > > > these expectations. > > > > I'm a bit surprised this thread has not had any more reactions. I would > > love to know what Sebas, Wade, Coolo, Dirk, David, Laurent, Pino and > > others think. > > I don't care. There are as many definitions on what is alpha and what is > beta as there are software projects. But I share the feeling alpha2 is more > suitable. Well i think, getting a bad echo at the moment won't help kde4 in the future. Especially if i look back on Apples Safari lanch last week (the also named it beta ...) I vote for alpha2.
Greetings, Andreas _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
