On Monday 18 June 2007, Tom Albers wrote: > Op zo 17 jun 2007 03:31 schreef u: > > On Sunday 17 June 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > ok, the question is if we can deliver what a user expects from a beta, a > > > complete desktop with some small bugs. > > > > give me a moment to recover from laughing. > > > > whew.. ok. so. the question is whether the user expectations are > > unrealistic > > and we don't care or whether we should try and pander to these expectations. > > I'm a bit surprised this thread has not had any more reactions. I would love > to know what Sebas, Wade, Coolo, Dirk, David, Laurent, Pino and others think.
My opinion is that the current state of kdebase doesn't allow us to call it a beta, i.e. I agree with you. I have always said so, but then again I usually tend to say "we don't need any schedules, we release when it's ready" and I can see how that doesn't work since without deadlines people (including me) don't get their act together. So I let it happens, the schedules and releases, but since you asked: no, the current kdebase can't be released as a beta. Oops now this mail is a bit too late; no ADSL since last week, only intermittent slow modem... -- David Faure, [EMAIL PROTECTED], sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE, Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org). _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
