Ok, I withdraw my request then. Thanks for the discussion. On Monday 13 December 2010 9:05:46 am Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote: > On xxMondayxx 13 xxDecemberxx 2010 14:35:07 Tom Albers wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > I'm waiting for objections. > > > > I'm going to raise one :( > > > > > > > So far we don't have any objections. If there are no objections in > > > > > day or so > > > > > I will offiically change the release schedule. > > > > > > > > Will's question is not answered yet. > > > > > > > > | Would the PIM team spend the extra 2 weeks on the desktop > > > > | versions or > > > > | on Kontact Mobile? > > > > > > Yes to both. > > > > I've read Tills mail and it is pretty clear to me. The focus for KDAB lies > > on the mobile version for the next two months. That means the desktop > > version will benefit from bugfixes in the underlying libs and akonadi, but > > KMail desktop will receive only little love. Although Till thinks KMail is > > ready enough to be release, I get the impression that it's not from > > several reports. > > > > Anyhow, I think 2 weeks delay will not solve much. > > > > > Especially, Kevin asked for more time to work on data migration issues > > > which mainly affect the desktop. > > > > Although this is a very import argument, I'm not sure two weeks is enough. > > And when the data migration might be ok, kmail itself might not be up for > > the end-user job yet. > > > > My proposal would be to continue with the schedule as planned, the kdepim > > team would need to decide to either release it as normal, relase it but > > mark the kdepim/kmail part as 'experimental', or skip the .0. > > > > Best, > I agree that delaying everything for a hypothetical benefit is too much, > especially if we considere that the current release schedule is tied to the > git migration. >
> > Best regards, > > Anne-Marie _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
