----- Original Message ----- > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 08:05, Anne-Marie Mahfouf <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On xxMondayxx 13 xxDecemberxx 2010 14:35:07 Tom Albers wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > >> > > > I'm waiting for objections. > >> > >> I'm going to raise one :( > >> > >> > > > So far we don't have any objections. If there are no > >> > > > objections in > >> > > > day or so > >> > > > I will offiically change the release schedule. > >> > > > >> > > Will's question is not answered yet. > >> > > > >> > > | Would the PIM team spend the extra 2 weeks on the desktop > >> > > | versions or > >> > > | on Kontact Mobile? > >> > > >> > Yes to both. > >> > >> I've read Tills mail and it is pretty clear to me. The focus for > >> KDAB lies > >> on the mobile version for the next two months. That means the > >> desktop > >> version will benefit from bugfixes in the underlying libs and > >> akonadi, but > >> KMail desktop will receive only little love. Although Till thinks > >> KMail is > >> ready enough to be release, I get the impression that it's not from > >> several reports. > >> > >> Anyhow, I think 2 weeks delay will not solve much. > >> > >> > Especially, Kevin asked for more time to work on data migration > >> > issues > >> > which mainly affect the desktop. > >> > >> Although this is a very import argument, I'm not sure two weeks is > >> enough. > >> And when the data migration might be ok, kmail itself might not be > >> up for > >> the end-user job yet. > >> > >> My proposal would be to continue with the schedule as planned, the > >> kdepim > >> team would need to decide to either release it as normal, relase it > >> but > >> mark the kdepim/kmail part as 'experimental', or skip the .0. > >> > >> Best, > > I agree that delaying everything for a hypothetical benefit is too > > much, > > especially if we considere that the current release schedule is tied > > to the > > git migration. > > > > Speaking of that, I think the Git people who want to move on 20th > > December > > must write all mailing lists in order to make it clear to every KDE > > contributor what is going to happen and when. > > > > Can we as the Release Team ask them to do so? > > I, as a Git person, asked the release team to send something over the > announcement list last week. > > In the normal course of doing the conversion I've been emailing lists > relevant to what I'm working on to double-check my work. Today I'm > going to send out a big cross-post for projects in > kdebase-workspace/runtime (assuming sysadmins upload the repos). But I > think something more formal & broad-spectrum from the release team > would be nice. > > Ian
Thread hyjacking... -- Tom Albers KDE _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
