-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10.06.2012 20:33, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Feel free to wait until the packages are released publicly. That > way you'll have packages that work [...] > There is not a single untested tarball in any semipublic site. > There are untested tarballs in a private site.
I think these two answers summarize nicely albeit with a very sad outcome what QA means to KDE. >> No, you don't. You just told me you expect *us* to do *your* QA, >> your *testing* and, ideally, sort *your* stuff out (including, >> according to some, informing individual project leads). >> Disrespectful. > *us* and *you* is *we* And that's another issue: No! *You* are the KDE upstream. *We* are downstream, the KDE packagers for the distributions. Yes, we'll gladly help you out but we're not here to do *upstream's* job. I assure you, we all have enough to do with our distro development. Let's put this thread to rest, though. I think we can both safely agree we have *completely* and seemingly irreconcilable points of view about QA and upstream/downstream roles. Since I seem to be the only packager seeing things the way I do (I guess others would have chimed in otherwise), I'll go back to lurking in here. - -- Best regards, Wulf -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/U7E8ACgkQnuVXRcSi+5qgJACgwSVyW956t0UqOLqpfNTDqvhh P/sAoM9noiHeUfDbnfXSgVfj1M0IfqOr =PGAH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
