Le Monday 08 June 2015 01:28:04 David Faure a écrit : > Hello packagers, > > The thread "Versioning of Frameworks" on kde-frameworks-devel has led to the > idea that some future frameworks (coming from the kdepim world) would not > be part of every Frameworks release, and would have their own versioning > scheme. This is at the request of their maintainer, Christian, CC'ed. > > For example: > KF 5.12 would contain KImap 2.1 > KF 5.13 would not contain a KImap release > KF 5.14 would contain KImap 2.1.1 > KF 5.15 would contain KImap 2.2 > > Would that work for you guys?
Just a question: Why put kimap as a framework if it doesn't follow the versionning ? It can live as a separate lib as actually no ? It doesn't make sense to create an exception for it. As I see as kimap development the example can be: KF 5.12 would contain KImap 2.1 KF 5.13 would not contain a KImap release KF 5.14 " KF 5.15 " Etc. So it doesn't make really sense to create an exception. Regards. -- Laurent Montel | [email protected] | KDE/Qt Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.fr _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
