On 6/8/15 4:29 PM, Mario Fux wrote: > Either I don't get this sarcasm or you might be wrong.
Yeah, sorry, I did an incredibly horrible job of describing what I meant. > "The whole point" of KDE Frameworks is that it is _modular_ and not > monolithic > as kdelibs was. As I see it the value of KDE Frameworks is the set of Qt > Addons with a unique license and spreading over different platforms. A high > quality set of additional features and libraries for Qt developers from > developers with a lot of experience. > > I don't think that the same version number of all released Frameworks as it > currently stands is the strong point of KDE Frameworks. To backup and restate what was in my head, and not what came out of my keyboard... ;) The pieces are modular, but the framework bundle is meant to be a kind of "snapshot-in-time" of a release, right? Having the "framework" versioned, and having all the pieces of the framework match that version, seems to me to make it much easier to know what is part of the blessed distribution as opposed to something being managed outside of the KDE frameworks' proper. That said, I should step out because other folks have been doing the release work of KDE on Mac for a while now so I have less skin in the game than most here. Sorry for the noise. -- Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick a.k.a. Raccoon Fink Open Source and Mac OS X development Blog: http://me.raccoonfink.com/ Music: http://music.raccoonfink.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
