On Monday 08 June 2015 11:21:56 Benjamin Reed wrote: > On 6/8/15 11:02 AM, Eric Hameleers wrote: > > The only sane way forward is that every Frameworks release contains > > all Frameworks tarballs, regardless of updates since the previous > > public release. Every Framework should adhere to the overall version > > number. > > Yeah, this proposal makes no sense to me. If you want to individually > manage a library with an independent numbering scheme, then shouldn't it > be a separate/external project? The whole point of the "framework" is > to provide a monolithic thing that has everything you need.
If that's the point of frameworks, being that monolithic thing, then indeed you are right. But I really hope it isn't. _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
