On Friday, 16 September 2016 22:52:32 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
> It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications release,
> doesn't align it's internal version numbers with the rest of the
> Applications release.
> This causes issues - as we've received complaints about various
> products (all being PIM products) missing versions on bugs.kde.org,
> due to this mismatch. It's also confusing for users.
> Can PIM please fall in line with the rest of Applications?
I don't think this is required: many pieces of Applications uses a different
internal version. I'd really like to have this not enforced.