On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Luigi Toscano
<luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it> wrote:
> On Friday, 16 September 2016 22:52:32 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications release,
>> doesn't align it's internal version numbers with the rest of the
>> Applications release.
>>
>> This causes issues - as we've received complaints about various
>> products (all being PIM products) missing versions on bugs.kde.org,
>> due to this mismatch. It's also confusing for users.
>>
>> Can PIM please fall in line with the rest of Applications?
>
> I don't think this is required: many pieces of Applications uses a different
> internal version. I'd really like to have this not enforced.

I'd like to see it enforced.
See https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335654#c7 for the confusion
created (and Sysadmin effort taken).

It also means that the process of releasing applications can't be
automated to create all the necessary versions, so someone has to do
it manually.
And chances are, it ain't going to be the application maintainer.

>
> Ciao
> --
> Luigi
>

Regards,
Ben

Reply via email to