Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > El dimecres, 13 de juliol de 2016, a les 1:27:21 CEST, Albert Astals Cid va > escriure: >> El divendres, 8 de juliol de 2016, a les 11:50:44 CEST, Andreas Sturmlechner >> va escriure: >>> On Friday, 8 July 2016 at 11:11, Luigi Toscano wrote: >>>> On Friday 08 of July 2016 11:03:05 Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: >>>>> None of them were ported yet, in fact they haven't seen commits in >>>>> years. >>>>> They should probably be converted to git, still, but imo no need to >>>>> keep >>>>> it releasing. >>>> >>>> Some of them could be probably dropped, but also isn't it possible that >>>> they slipped out of the radar because not on git? Would it be possible >>>> to >>>> have them converted first and see if this changes? >>> >>> kommander and kfilereplace are not actually webdev related, so could be >>> moved into other categories (kdeutils?) if not dropped. >>> >>> Not sure how many people still do image maps (so chances this will be >>> picked up again are slim), and klinkstatus still depends on kdepimlibs-4 >>> to build. >> Let's move them to git first and then decide if we want to drop them or not. >> >> Given the freeze for KDE Applications 16.08 is like in 2 days i would not >> rush for now, let's all make a note for 2.5 months and decide if we want to >> release them for KDE Applications 16.12. > > So it's 2.5 months later now. > > I would like to get them moved to git if possible, get them released for KDE > Applications 16.12 and tell people they need to start caring about them if > they don't want to see them dropped for 17.04 > > Now the question is, how do we get them into git?
I think that sysadmins have (or had) a system dedicated to SVN-to-git conversion, and also the examples of the old conversions. There are some instructions here: https://techbase.kde.org/Projects/MoveToGit/UsingSvn2Git > > Or, am i being too naive and we should just drop them? Well, it would be good if this transfer is done and this knowledge is not lost (you never know). -- Luigi