On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Nicolás Alvarez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> El 6 oct 2016, a las 19:44, Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> escribió: >> >> El dimecres, 5 d’octubre de 2016, a les 22:06:22 CEST, Ben Cooksley va >> escriure: >>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Luigi Toscano <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: >>>>> El dimecres, 13 de juliol de 2016, a les 1:27:21 CEST, Albert Astals Cid >>>>> va >>>>> >>>>> escriure: >>>>>> El divendres, 8 de juliol de 2016, a les 11:50:44 CEST, Andreas >>>>>> Sturmlechner>>> >>>>>> va escriure: >>>>>>>> On Friday, 8 July 2016 at 11:11, Luigi Toscano wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Friday 08 of July 2016 11:03:05 Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: >>>>>>>>> None of them were ported yet, in fact they haven't seen commits in >>>>>>>>> years. >>>>>>>>> They should probably be converted to git, still, but imo no need to >>>>>>>>> keep >>>>>>>>> it releasing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Some of them could be probably dropped, but also isn't it possible >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> they slipped out of the radar because not on git? Would it be possible >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> have them converted first and see if this changes? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> kommander and kfilereplace are not actually webdev related, so could be >>>>>>> moved into other categories (kdeutils?) if not dropped. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not sure how many people still do image maps (so chances this will be >>>>>>> picked up again are slim), and klinkstatus still depends on >>>>>>> kdepimlibs-4 >>>>>>> to build. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let's move them to git first and then decide if we want to drop them or >>>>>> not. >>>>>> >>>>>> Given the freeze for KDE Applications 16.08 is like in 2 days i would >>>>>> not >>>>>> rush for now, let's all make a note for 2.5 months and decide if we want >>>>>> to >>>>>> release them for KDE Applications 16.12. >>>>> >>>>> So it's 2.5 months later now. >>>>> >>>>> I would like to get them moved to git if possible, get them released for >>>>> KDE Applications 16.12 and tell people they need to start caring about >>>>> them if they don't want to see them dropped for 17.04 >>>>> >>>>> Now the question is, how do we get them into git? >>>> >>>> I think that sysadmins have (or had) a system dedicated to SVN-to-git >>>> conversion, and also the examples of the old conversions. There are some >>>> instructions here: >>>> https://techbase.kde.org/Projects/MoveToGit/UsingSvn2Git >>> >>> We had such a system - all such machines have since been shutdown though. >>> I think Nicolas has a container on one of our machines which he does >>> the occasional conversion which gets requested in, but it has been a >>> long time since that was last used if I recall correctly. > > I had one in fiesta, but I seem to recall you removed it to free space? I can > recreate it though.
>From what I can tell the container itself is definitely still there. Might be potentially missing it's copy of SVN? > >> Any way i can get that 65G svn file somehow or we can't port anything else >> from svn to git? > > It can be downloaded via anonymous rsync, IIRC it's rsync.kde.org::svnmirror. > >> Or Nicolás can I convince you to git-ify kdewebdev? > > Maybe tomorrow when I manage to wake up. It's adminbeers night today ;) > > -- > Nicolás Thanks, Ben
