El dilluns, 17 d’octubre de 2016, a les 20:31:50 CEST, Nicolás Alvarez va escriure: > 2016-10-06 19:44 GMT-03:00 Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]>: > > El dimecres, 5 d’octubre de 2016, a les 22:06:22 CEST, Ben Cooksley va > > > > escriure: > >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Luigi Toscano <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > >> > Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > >> >> El dimecres, 13 de juliol de 2016, a les 1:27:21 CEST, Albert Astals > >> >> Cid > >> >> va > >> >> > >> >> escriure: > >> >>> El divendres, 8 de juliol de 2016, a les 11:50:44 CEST, Andreas > >> >>> Sturmlechner>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> va escriure: > >> >>>> On Friday, 8 July 2016 at 11:11, Luigi Toscano wrote: > >> >>>>> On Friday 08 of July 2016 11:03:05 Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > >> >>>>>> None of them were ported yet, in fact they haven't seen commits in > >> >>>>>> years. > >> >>>>>> They should probably be converted to git, still, but imo no need > >> >>>>>> to > >> >>>>>> keep > >> >>>>>> it releasing. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Some of them could be probably dropped, but also isn't it possible > >> >>>>> that > >> >>>>> they slipped out of the radar because not on git? Would it be > >> >>>>> possible > >> >>>>> to > >> >>>>> have them converted first and see if this changes? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> kommander and kfilereplace are not actually webdev related, so could > >> >>>> be > >> >>>> moved into other categories (kdeutils?) if not dropped. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Not sure how many people still do image maps (so chances this will > >> >>>> be > >> >>>> picked up again are slim), and klinkstatus still depends on > >> >>>> kdepimlibs-4 > >> >>>> to build. > >> >>> > >> >>> Let's move them to git first and then decide if we want to drop them > >> >>> or > >> >>> not. > >> >>> > >> >>> Given the freeze for KDE Applications 16.08 is like in 2 days i would > >> >>> not > >> >>> rush for now, let's all make a note for 2.5 months and decide if we > >> >>> want > >> >>> to > >> >>> release them for KDE Applications 16.12. > >> >> > >> >> So it's 2.5 months later now. > >> >> > >> >> I would like to get them moved to git if possible, get them released > >> >> for > >> >> KDE Applications 16.12 and tell people they need to start caring about > >> >> them if they don't want to see them dropped for 17.04 > >> >> > >> >> Now the question is, how do we get them into git? > >> > > >> > I think that sysadmins have (or had) a system dedicated to SVN-to-git > >> > conversion, and also the examples of the old conversions. There are > >> > some > >> > instructions here: > >> > https://techbase.kde.org/Projects/MoveToGit/UsingSvn2Git > >> > >> We had such a system - all such machines have since been shutdown though. > >> I think Nicolas has a container on one of our machines which he does > >> the occasional conversion which gets requested in, but it has been a > >> long time since that was last used if I recall correctly. > > > > Any way i can get that 65G svn file somehow or we can't port anything else > > from svn to git? > > > > Or Nicolás can I convince you to git-ify kdewebdev? > > It's done! Please review: > kde:scratch/nalvarez/kdewebdev-kfilereplace > kde:scratch/nalvarez/kdewebdev-kimagemapeditor > kde:scratch/nalvarez/kdewebdev-klinkstatus > kde:scratch/nalvarez/kdewebdev-kommander
I don't think much changes happened but the branches from https://websvn.kde.org/branches/Applications/ are missing (i.e. you only have the KDE/XXX ones), would it be much work to get them in? Cheers, Albert > > The history seems to be complete, but I haven't tested if the latest > master compiles etc. I think they rely on the global > kdewebdev/CMakeLists.txt and don't build standalone. > > I also need to know where to push the final git repos. Should I create > a kdewebdev module in repo-metadata? And what needs to be done with > i18n for a svn->git move?
