Ross Patterson wrote:
Rob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
we've had extensive off-line conversations and are pretty much on the
same page about the current state of things, although i know he's very
interested in hearing feedback from all of you about your opinions
about where remember should go from here.
Before I start getting any feedback on specific directions, I'd like to
get a sense of the use or membrane and/or remember in the wild and the
interests of all stakeholders. If you will, please take a few seconds
to answer as many of these questions as you care to. Feel free to be
brief, in fact I prefer it. :)
- How many membrane and/or remember deployments are you responsible for?
4, with another one in the works.
- What general direction would you like to see membrane/remember
development take? Select one or rank by priority:
[3 ] new features
[2 ] improve performance
[1 ] more simplicity/maintainability
- What specific direction would you like to see membrane/remember
development take? Select one or rank by priority:
[ ] non-AT option
[x ] lightweight AT profile schema
[ ] other, please describe
- What do you use membrane/remember for? Select all that apply:
[x ] Archetypes Schema for members
[ ] membership workflow
[ ] extended member searching/cataloging
[ ] other, please describe:
- Do you use membrane without remember? If so please describe.
No - use a ArchGenXML-created remember product tied into MySQL to do additional
user registration verification.
Thanks in advance for all your responses!
Ross
--
Archive:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/remember/lists/remember/archive/2008/12/1228267212368
To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions.
--
Archive:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/remember/lists/remember/archive/2008/12/1228310611348
To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions.
