On Dec 02, 2008 08:20 PM, Ross Patterson wrote: > Rob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > we've had extensive off-line conversations and are pretty much on the > > same page about the current state of things, although i know he's very > > interested in hearing feedback from all of you about your opinions > > about where remember should go from here. > > Before I start getting any feedback on specific directions, I'd like to > get a sense of the use or membrane and/or remember in the wild and the > interests of all stakeholders. If you will, please take a few seconds > to answer as many of these questions as you care to. Feel free to be > brief, in fact I prefer it. :) > > - How many membrane and/or remember deployments are you responsible for?
1 > - What general direction would you like to see membrane/remember > development take? Select one or rank by priority: [2] new features [3] improve performance [1] more simplicity/maintainability > - What specific direction would you like to see membrane/remember > development take? Select one or rank by priority: [ ] non-AT option [x] lightweight AT profile schema [ ] other, please describe Maybe it's a plone, > - What do you use membrane/remember for? Select all that apply: [ ] Archetypes Schema for members [x] membership workflow [ ] extended member searching/cataloging [ ] other, please describe: > - Do you use membrane without remember? If so please describe. no -- Archive: http://www.openplans.org/projects/remember/lists/remember/archive/2008/12/1228451213654 To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions.
