Eric Lemmon wrote: > > Since you must have two antennas and the equivalent of two duplexers to > make either system work, it is very likely cheaper to simply use two > antennas- one for each repeater.
Not necessarily. You can combine the combiner and multicoupler on one antenna, but it's even more expensive then two antennas. Here is another possibility: Get a dual dipole array antenna. It's like a large array, but has two feedlines - one for the lower half and one for the upper half. Use each half into a standard duplexer going to each repeater. One 'antenna' (one mount, one pole), but two feedlines and two standard-duplexed repeaters. Joe M. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
