Right. Use identical setups for all the receivers to make them all sound
the same, which will make the voting a lot less obvious.
Jeff.
At 04:40 PM 3/12/2004, you wrote:
>Jeff Otterson wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Consider a crossbanded MASTR II mobile for your remote sites, and use
> > the receiver for the main site.
> >
> > Start with a VHF and a UHF MASTR II. Put the UHF transmitter into the
> > VHF radio and duplex that radio. This will be your remote receiver and
> > link transmitter. Take the remaining UHF receiver and use that as your
> > link receiver.
> >
> > Besides the obvious benefit of using the nearly bombproof MASTR II
> > receivers, your remote sites will benefit from using a single package for
> > all the RF.
> >
> > Jeff.
> >
>
>As Jeff alluded to, it is VERY helpful if the equipment is all the same
>all the way through, in other words, if one rx path is, say, MVP rx, MVP
>link tx (another good way to go btw), Micor link rx, then ideally they
>should all follow that path. Otherwise you may have to do some audio
>response tailoring to make everything match. Ther should be NO noticable
>difference in audio between receivers. Voting will be more reliable, and
>it will be much better copy when audio isn't bouncing between 'tinny'
>and 'bassy' in one transmission.
>
>--
>Jim Barbour
>WD8CHL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
