Steve, I disagree. Our Hall voter will regularly vote EASILY 5 times/second. We have four receivers and sometimes it will vote to all of them within one second. Yup, it's best to have identical receivers, but not absolutely necessary. Our system has several different brands and vintages of receivers and is very difficult to hear a change in vote.
I am not familiar with the *diversity receivers*, but one of those might work well there too. Seems they must vote somehow internally. You obviously can't just add audio from two receivers together and expect that to work right. Maybe someone on this list could educate us on those......? Laryn K8TVZ --- In [email protected], "Steve S. Bosshard \(NU5D\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think a voter is the right answer in this instance, because the > effects, ie, picket fence, and flutter happen faster than a voter can > respond. Also, you would have to have a second receiver, with the same > audio characteristics as the first, etc. > > Perhaps the better answer would be to look and see how diversity receivers, > that is receivers with two antenna ports work. A good example would be a > Johnson 8000 repeater station in the 800 Mhz. band designed for diversity > operation. > > But, I might be wrong, > > Steve > NU5D Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
