Read me last long reply on the subject, and my reply to Bob's points
just minutes ago. When it comes to links, the advantages are greater
because you have even more audio shaping/processing going on, and each
little bit sums. It doesn't take long until everyone notices it.
Take a glass of water, and the same size empty glass. Pour them back and
forth as fast as you can (be fast - not careful). You may not lose much
water each time, but after a bit, you will see that the level has
significantly decreased. Most audio circuits are very 'leaky' (using the
same analogy).
I would say, however, that even though you see it over
and over, each time the points are more condensed. :-)
Joe M.
bradley glen wrote:
>
> As audio is discussed over and over often I see there
> is less and less content in the answers.
>
> I have a question . I run several repeaters all
> employing pre-de-emph as per standard to a star
> network.
>
> What is the major decision between going "flat " or
> shaped audio? I would take it that running up of the
> repeater and links is a breeze as it is what goes in
> must come out .
>
> Thanks
>
> Brad
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
