Well, if nothing else, that page shows that even back then, people used FM and PM interchangeably. In the beginning of the article, it touts their "frequency modulated (FM) system", but later it states "success of the system was due to choosing phase modulation".
Bob (S-Com Bob), would it be a fair statement to say that traditionally, transmitters have generally been PM (either true PM or emphasized FM), but receivers have been FM all along? I base this on your last post. Joe M. Ralph Mowery wrote: > > > > > Again, I think you're off base with your supposition. > > You want us to believe that PM is why we Pre-emp FM. > > That's simply not the case. This is not supported by > > anything I have ever seen or read, only by you. > > > > Not that I really care but look at this as to why PM was used for > the FM transmitters in mobile communications. > > <http://www.ieee.org/organizations/history_center/milestones_photos/police_radio.html> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
