At 07:09 PM 6/7/04 -0500, you wrote:

> > From: Mike WA6ILQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Weather Radios
>
>[...]
>
> > >FWIW, the SAME code definitions are in the referenced PDF.  The
> > >encoderis even somethng that might be worth writing as a sound
> > >card utility, provided the sound card has the requisite transient response
> > >and stability.
> >
> > I'd like to see that as a embedded processor function on a repeater 
> controller
> > add-on card - in the same sense as the RLC-MOT is a add-on card.
> > Picture the ability to take a old 160mhz receiver strip - let's say from a
> > Motrac - something that would normally be considered as a doorstop.
> > Buy a cheap crystal from somewhere on the local weather channel.
> > Add this board - call it the Simple-SAME decoder between the audio
> > output and the repeater controller input.  You instantly have a high
> > performance SAME receiver for the cost of the Simple-SAME and a
> > crystal.
>
>I admit I wasn't thinking that far into it -- I was hung up on the
>notion of generating SAME codes for the purpose of testing decoders.
>
>That would be a slick little gadget.  Since the SAME codes include EOM
>that would allow the repeater to go back to normal operations when the
>message ended.  I see a need to control warnings coming from the
>decoder independently, though; after the horn has blown for a tornado
>warning one's users probably wouldn't be any too interested in a severe
>T'storm watch.  Possibly something like the decoder outputs as one input
>to an AND gate with the other being a latch, then all 31 AND gates
>feeding into a single OR gate.
>
>[snip]
>
>de kg7yy

Actually the CAT Auto product seems, at first reading, to do just
what I was looking for.

<http://www.catauto.com/wd100.html>

Mike WA6ILQ





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to