Actually ...  I contacted the owner of the site where the files are
located...  this was Mike's reply.  I posted his reply yesterday...  or so I
thought.  If I did I apologize for the wasted bandwidth..  Mike can be
contacted at the following URL..  <http://www.sandman.com/> by clicking on
the contact us link....

73's
Mike Perryman
K5JMP
*****************
Hi.

It's painful to transfer this stuff to a computer file, and the files are 
huge at a reasonable resolution (an uncompressed avi version of what you 
saw is 125 meg). I just did it because I don't think many people will ever 
see (or notice?) an FCC Police Car.

>>>>It was recorded off G4-TechTV, from a program called The Screen
Savers.<<<< 
They will probably replay it at some point. They had recently gone to 
Washington, and did a lot of stuff at the FCC.

TechTV was recently bought out by Comcast, who threw away the TechTV site, 
so I don't think you'll find it or info on it at their site - but you might?

They just showed clipping a couple of inductive gizmos on a fake power line 
to send/receive the data, showed an old X10 gizmo (I don't know why?), and 
a circular antenna on a tripod that was picking up emissions (with the 
emissions shown on a spectrum display from 5 feet away, for a few seconds). 
About 2.5 minutes total, primarily with Powell talking about the future of 
BPL in general terms.

The testing they talked about for a moment was very vague. The whole thing 
was vague.

I can have our video guy put the whole 1 hour program on a VHS tape if 
you'd like (easier than finding that part of it). $25 plus shipping for his 
time to screw around with it (he might have time next week). It would cost 
A LOT more to put it in a video file (it took two hours to do what you saw).

Mike

*******************


-----Original Message-----
From: Neil McKie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 8:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FCC Enforcment



  Looks like someone finally figured it out ... ;) 

  Neil 

Dave Schmidt wrote:
> 
> The weather forecast should have been your first clue.   Even though it
> doesn't say exactly where it is... it have a picture of the Sears Tower
> .... the station is in Chicago!
> 
> Secondly, to answer the first persons issue about triangulation... that
> is what they were doing by driving around. They initially took a
> bearing, drove past it, took another bearing reading and then drove
> around again to grab another bearing and then nailed it. Which is
> entirely possible with what Hams have available to them except what
> Uncle Charles has is more "computerized" so a monkey can operate it.
> 
>  Example: A ham - one person, not a whole fox hunt team - can drive
> around, take a bearing with a yagi antenna, drive around some more and
> grab a bearing and then finally drive to another location to grab a
> bearing each time logging their GPS location where they took the
> reading ... whalla, plot your GPS locations and bearings onto a map and
> BAM! you have your triangulation with just using one "tracker". This is
> the old skool method, unless you have big $$$ for a computerized GPS
> enhanced Doppler RDF system like the FCC.
> 
> Its far Far FAR!!! more accurate than taking one directional reading
> and then accusing XYZ station for causing interference just because
> that station is within or close that path from where the reading was
> taken. I speak from experience since I have been the accused from a ego
> sensitive, never can be wrong, blame it on everyone else person in
> Hubertus, WI who will take a reading from his back yard and accuse
> anyone and everyone who is on his schnit list that day who just so
> happens to be within that RF path - of which his reading may be a wee
> "bent" or favored due to the alcohol and or drugs.
> 
> Intelligence and perseverance for accuracy will go a long way rather
> than making gereral QRM accusations about an individual who one THINKS
> or ASSUMES is the problem.
> 
> Dave / N9NLU
> 
> --- Paul Guello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to get the rest of this video.  Any idea
> > where one would look?  It says 'MetroVision 7 abc',
> > but no indication of where they are.
> > Paul, kb9wlc
> >
> > --- Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here is a link for an interesting article about
> > > interference of radio
> > > signal and how they are  tracked down ,  I always
> > > thought you had to
> > > Triangulate a Signal ,   Ride along with the FCC  I
> > > did Virus Check  files
> > > are ok.
> > >
> > > Enjoy  Don KA9QJG
> > >





 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to