Mr. Grizzard-
So now I ask YOU, are you "normally this oblivious, or is this a special
case"?  As you state below, the thread evolved into discussing coordination.

The squelch sense issue was *WELL* addressed in recent threads here.  It is
also covered on several web sites & in very, very basic transistor logic
handbooks.  Why do you propose beating that dead horse, Mr. Grizzard?


------ Original Message ------
Received: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:10:03 AM CST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] snide remarks

> 
> > From: JOHN MACKEY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 00:46:28 -0600
> > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] snide remarks
> > 
> > Coordination has become a joke in certain areas, because the coordination
> > representatives are not professional or following decent rules of
conduct.
> 
> [snip]
> 
> Gee.  Tony's intent and meaning sailed right over the top of your head,
> didn't it?  Are you normally this oblivious, or is this a special case?
> 
> Am I justified in calling your powers of observation into question?
> 
> If I am, is a public forum the proper place to do so?
> 
> Let's return to the events that led to Mr. King's ire, shall we?
> 
> A new repeater builder asked how to invert the sense of a squelch
> signal, and one of the august (yes, "august" is properly capitalized.
> Look it up) members of this mailing list jumped on him with all four
> feet.  Yes, I just did imply that the jumper is an animal; allow me to
> make it explicit by calling him a jackass.  For the wasted bandwidth, he
> could have answered the question two or three ways; instead, he chose to
> assuage his own feelings of inferiority by lording it over someone he
> saw as lower on the totem pole.  Was that justified?
> 
> Another member of this list attempted to dissuade a would-be repeater
> ownder from erecting another 10 meter repeater.  In the course of that
> discussion, someone mentioned coordination -- and another august member
> of this list loosed a highly unprofessional broadside at someone that
> was not present to defend himself.  You yourself have continued to beat
> the place in the road where there used to be a greasy spot where a dead
> horse used to lay, hijacking Mr. King's thread in order to do so.  What
> is your justification in doing so?
> 
> Now allow me to add one of my own.
> 
> A new member posted in HTML.  After a request that he quit doing so, he
> did.  He left Micro$oft's damnedable "smart quotes" enabled, though, and
> thoroughly scrambled the presentation in my xterm window on my Linux
> computer.  When I asked him to turn them off, yet another august member
> of this list set up a straw man and thoroughly demolished it, implying
> as he did so that I was less than capable if I could not parse meaning
> from within HTML coding.  I didn't think he needed to be set straight in
> public, so I sent him a private E-mail informing him that his bogus
> argument was, in point of fact, bogus.  See, Micro$lop used control
> characters for their damnedable "smart quotes", and terminals -- such as
> xterm, the "X Terminal" -- use control characters to, well, control the
> behavior of the terminal.  They ring the bell, or turn off scroll, or
> reposition the cursor, or clear the viewing window, or any number of
> other things.  That's why they're called "control characters" and why
> the key used to create them is called the "control key".  Apparently,
> instead of correcting him in private I should have exposed his ignorance
> in public and held him to account for it.  Mea culpa.  I have corrected
> my error here.
> 
> Mr. Mackey, do you care to address even *one* of these three examples 
> of what Mr. King is inveighing against, or do you merely wish to continue
> to beat the spot where a dead horse used to lie?  Your call, sir.
> 
> de kg7yy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to