Thank you for the honorific, Mr. Mackey. I sincerely appreciate it. This is a special case. I waxed offensive in order to place you in the crosshairs. How comfortable are you when you're called on the spot in public with no basis for it?
Mr. King does not believe the thread devolved into discussing coordination. (No, I meant "devolved", not "evolved".) Witness his response to Mr. Duehr. Yes, the squelch issue is well covered in manifold places. I know of at least three ways to implement an inverter, and given a moment or two I can think of several other ways to implement one that also translates levels and has hysteresis. Now, perhaps you can tell me how Groucho's naked contempt for the original questioner added to that discussion. de kg7yy -----Original Message----- From: JOHN MACKEY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Dec 3, 2004 9:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] snide remarks Mr. Grizzard- So now I ask YOU, are you "normally this oblivious, or is this a special case"? As you state below, the thread evolved into discussing coordination. The squelch sense issue was *WELL* addressed in recent threads here. It is also covered on several web sites & in very, very basic transistor logic handbooks. Why do you propose beating that dead horse, Mr. Grizzard? Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
