I agree that re-education of some FCC employees is needed. However, I think it would be nice if the FCC had at least 2 or 3 "knowledgable" people, that knew what they were doing and only worked with Part 95 stuff. Johnny
corwinmoore wrote: > --- In [email protected], Barry Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >>Thanks to Russ, I contacted the FCC WTB regarding >>the usage of DCS/DPL or anything other than >>common tone names like PL from the Motorola trade >>mark and was confirmed that anything other than >>PL was not authorized under part 95.181 sub >>section "G & H". > > > Like Joe said, this is completely off-base. > Please give us the name of the WTB employee who made this statement. > (There are FCC procedures for "mandatory re-education" of employees > who give out erroneous information. And it goes into their personnel > file.) > - Corwin Moore (PRSG) > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
