Hi Wade,

Thanks for the suggestions.  I guess my gutt told me the proper tune-up
procedure was the way to go.  We just didn't have the time to do it at the
time.

I have one question about what you said.  You say I should have pass-reject
duplexers on both systems.  How can I put a pass-reject duplexer on a radio
that has only one antenna port?  I can see why the filtering would be
helpful, but the remote base is operating in half-duplex so it really
doesn't seem necessary.

There is a good duplexer on the repeater itself, and the link doesn't appear
to desense the repeater.  Frankly, I don't care if the remote base is
desensed a little, as long as I can receive the repeater at the other end,
which I can.  I do notice a quiet squeel in the background of the received
signal on the remote, which I assume is the repeater's transmitter.  I think
putting a notch can on the remote base, to notch out the repeater's
transmitter, might do the trick.

The squeel, while annoying, isn't a big deal right now.  The repeater itself
id deaf as a post, and we know that is attributable to the Micor receiver
itself.

Thanks and 73,
Chris, KG0BP



----- Original Message -----
From: "Wade Lake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] in-band linking update


>
>       The UHF Micor Mobile was a little tricky to tune, especially the AFC
> type.  I would take care to follow the tuning procedure as outlined in the
> manual to the letter.
>
>      Also, I am not sure what isolation measures you have already taken
but
> they would have to be fairly extensive for pairs that close in frequency
to
> coexist happily at the same site, in order to work properly.  I would
> suggest all 100% sheided cables - preferably Heliax, Pass/reject type
> duplexers on both systems, and at least 1 extra high quality pass cavity
on
> both transmitters.  This is just for starters.  Each site is configured
> differently so there may be several other measures to take.  Good earth
> grounds to all components of the system and extra sheilding for mobile
> radios used in a full duplex environment are 2 other necessary things to
do.
>
>      It sounds like you have quite the system, and you are probably aware
of
> the suggestions I am making here but sometimes the obvious things are the
> easiest to forget.  Sounds like your getting there.
>
> Best of luck to you and 73,
>
> Wade - KR7K
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 4:35 PM
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] in-band linking update
>
>
> >
> > All,
> >
> > A couple months ago I posted a question about in-band linking.  I
thought
> > I'd post an update on how it seems to be working.
> >
> > The repeater is on 442.750+ running about 25 watts.  It's a converted
> Micor
> > mobile.
> >
> > The remote base listens on 443.025 and transmits about 25 watts on
> 448.025.
> > The repeater it's talking to is about 90 miles away over a very good
path.
> > The remote base is an Icom 900 module attached to an FC-900.
> >
> > The repeater shows no obvious desense, and the signal strength of the
link
> > is full-quieting.  There is one odity, though.  The link seems to have
> some
> > sort of high-pitched, low--amplitude, squeel on it.  I assume this is
some
> > spur from the repeater's transmitter.  We plan to try to notch that out
> when
> > we get a chance.
> >
> > There is one odity, though.  The Micor has been in service for about 2
> years
> > now.  When we first set it up, the receiver sensativity was about .35
UV.
> > Now, we can't get it to come below about .7UV.  I should point out that
we
> > didn't do the full tuning procedure, we just tried to tweak things back
> into
> > place.  Also, the Micor has not been checked since it was put in service
2
> > years ago...  That is, it hasn't been checked until it was moved
> yesterday.
> >
> > My question is, is there anything that commonly goes bad in these things
> > that might cause this?  We have plenty of spare receivers around, so
> that's
> > not an issue, I was just curious if anyone had any ideas of things to
> check.
> >
> > Also, does anyone have any simplified tuning instructions for the UHF
> Micor
> > mobile or any tips that might make the procedure go more smoothly?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chris, KG0BP
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to