Randy;
Do not feel responsible for what happened. Anyone who
proposes something "unusual" should be prepared to justify it to this
group and should have some evidence to back it or else a really thick
skin.....:-)
Too many folks on this list "been there, done that" to
listen to some exotic claims without pressing for proof...Lashing out
is usually the byproduct of not having anything to back it.
Even engineers can learn new things ... but we as a species
need facts not conjecture... theories are ok, but need to be proven
if it is going to become a new "fact".
If Mick wishes to submit some performance analysis
documented with test equipment that we can analyze, great, but it
looks like he chooses not to...His questioners propose his comments
are flawed by general accepted engineering practice.... least of all
not really "portable or mobile" by most folks standards, consequently
not really a valid answer to help you solve your technical dilemma....
You may want to fill us in on your application for some more
focused information and ideas as your initial request for a mobile
duplexer is not real workable... other options may be much easier to do.
Doug
KD8B
At 04:16 PM 4/23/2006, you wrote:
>Hi Group we did not mean to stir up anything over a simple queston, I
>obtained alot of information from it but it seems it also caused a few
>problems. We all have our own opinons thats what makes us human.
>
> Randy
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
