Are there plans on the web for using garage door systems to operate gates?  
Remember, the gate
may have to be modified to work with the garage door opener.  One can find 
similar systems at
Home Improvement centers in the $500 - $1,000 range, depending upon the gate 
style.  From a security
viewpoint this would be the way to go.  Using the company frequency even with a 
custom TT
would compromise the integrity of the facility since an "enemy"  could record 
and analyze the
TT sequence.

Jack  -  N7OO

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 6:37 AM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT: Need to find a product to develop 
goodwill at a tower site(s)


  Actually, they will have to replace all the mikes with TT mikes. Given the 
cost of the new mikes and special equipment at the electric gates, etc, it 
would be a lot cheaper to go with the garage door opener style system. Maybe 
I'll work up an estimate of what they might spent for both systems and the 
economics might help them make a better choice.

  joe
  -------------- Original message ----------------------
  From: "Dick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  > They already own the radios, they already have the freq, no new in-vehicle 
  > gear
  > needed and no training to speak of.
  > 
  > Dick
  > 
  > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > To: [email protected]
  > Sent: 26 May, 2007 15:22
  > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT: Need to find a product to develop 
  > goodwill at a tower site(s)
  > 
  > 
  > They rejected this idea. They want to use the company radios, for some 
  > reason that I can't figure out.
  > 
  > Joe
  > -------------- Original message ----------------------
  > From: "Chuck Kelsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  > > It'll be much more secure than broadcasting tones over the company 
  > > frequency
  > > where someone could be listening. Also, the garage door openers are short
  > > range so that there's less chance of an accidental unlocking.
  > >
  > > Chuck
  > >
  > >
  > > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > > From: "Dick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  > > To: <[email protected]>
  > > Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 5:47 PM
  > > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT: Need to find a product to develop
  > > goodwill at a tower site(s)
  > >
  > >
  > > > Good idea, Chuck. Sorry I didn't think of that.
  > > > Keep it simple.
  > > >
  > > > 73,
  > > >
  > > > Dick W1NMZ
  > > >
  > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > > > From: Chuck Kelsey
  > > > To: [email protected]
  > > > Sent: 26 May, 2007 13:23
  > > > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT: Need to find a product to develop
  > > > goodwill at a tower site(s)
  > > >
  > > >
  > > > Why not just use a garage door opener radio?
  > > >
  > > > Chuck
  > > > WB2EDV
  > > >
  > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  > > > To: <[email protected]>
  > > > Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 4:03 PM
  > > > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] OT: Need to find a product to develop 
  > > > goodwill
  > > > at a tower site(s)
  > > >
  > > >> Hello to All,
  > > >>
  > > >> I am starting to develop a future ham repeater relation with a tower
  > > >> site(s) owner and recently got a request for something unusual. The
  > > >> company has a fleet of VHF radio equipped vehicles. They want to pull 
  > > >> up
  > > >> to a site, enter a touch-tone sequence on the mike, and open a security
  > > >> gate at the site. I could kludge together something, but would rather
  > > >> find something commercially available. Anytime I have kludged something
  > > >> together, I have ended up having to repair it for longer that I 
  > > >> expected.
  > > >> Something with a VHF receiver, TT decode and relay contact output would
  > > >> be
  > > >> great.
  > > >>
  > > >> Any ides if this is even made commercially? I know that some
  > > >> fire/ambulance departments use a similar idea to open and close the
  > > >> firehouse door. Some also have the ability to control traffic control
  > > >> lights on their way to a situation.
  > > >>
  > > >> 73, Joe, k1ike 
  > 



   


Reply via email to