I'm tuning up a cavity-type duplexer for a 70cm repeater, and in the
process, I showed my results to a fellow ham.  He asked a couple
questions that cause me to think; so I decided to ask the experts...

FIRST QUESTION TOPIC:

For reference, my primary cavities were made by Tx-Rx Systems, and
have both bandpass and band-reject tuning controls on each cavity. 
When tuning them (either singularly or as pairs in-series), I see and
can adjust the band-pass and notch for the desired Tx and Rx frequencies.

However, in the broad-band sweep, I can also see a bunch of other
signals passing through the cavities; all of which are well away from
my Tx/Rx frequencies.  I suspect that these are normal, and are a side
effect of how the can-type resonant cavities work.  Am I correct in
this assumption?

As a sanity check, I combined this set of cavities with another
(Phelps-Dodge) set I have, and tuned these supplemental cavities for
band-pass only (one cavity for my Tx frequency, and one cavity for my
Rx frequency).  Sure enough when I put these in series with my primary
set, I can eliminate nearly all of the "other signals" from the
broad-band sweep.  This observation seems to reinforce my initial
assumption about the Tx-Rx cavities.  Do you agree?


SECOND QUESTION TOPIC:

The other ham thought that I should end up with a band-pass that is
narrow enough to eliminate adjacent repeaters (at 16kHz spacing, as
per the current SCRRBA band-plan separation).  I tried but I cannot
get either set of cavities to have that narrow of a band-pass; at
least not without sacraficing most of the signal in the process.  I
suspect that the receiver and transmitter need to actually inforce
these much narrower bandwidth requirements within the broader
protection provided by the cavity-duplexer.  I suspect that I should
focus my duplexer tuning on passing the desired frequency, notching
the alternate repeater frequency, and trying to do so with the least
amount of signal attenuation.  Am I correct in these understandings?



For both of these question topics, feel free to point out anything
that I might be missing or misunderstanding.  I'm by no means
sensative about this stuff, and still consider myself on the learning
curve about duplexers and repeaters in general.

Thank-you (in advance) for your time, thought, and opinions.

<<< vern >>>

 

Reply via email to