Possible, the fiber optic modular building is less then 300 feet from
the main building...

--- In [email protected], Doug Bade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would seriously look at the possibility of building an offsite data 
> center DR facility as it seems like it has the start for it assuming 
> fiber connectivity can be brought in.. You may be able to generate 
> some serious revenue to pay the rent.... so to speak.. A building 
> like this has some real potential in DR if the price/service is 
> right...literally nuke proof...and secure to boot away from 
> hazards... other than the tower which is not really to much in this
size....
> 
> We have an underground version of one of these type facilities near 
> my home and I am waiting to see it go on the blocks some day... 
> although it is still currently in use. Not a big tower, but lots of 
> connectivity....although it is a Rohn 65ish class 200+ footer...
> 
> Doug
> KD8B
> 
> 
> At 10:01 AM 6/19/2007, you wrote:
> 
> 
> > >
> > > > I wouldnt do it if it was a former long lines site (aka owned by
> > > > american tower)
> > > > They make everything a PITA and you also have to get a radio
> > > > engineer to do your site design.
> >
> >To to state again, even though this site was a former long lines site,
> >it was and has never been owned by American Tower.
> >
> > >
> >
> >The good thing about this site is, if the person decides to maintain
> >ownership, which is doubtful now, he most likely will not have any
> >hams interested, or anyone for that matter in using the site. There
> >are several towers within a 10 mile radius that are taller. There is
> >only a handle full of repeaters in our area, though all the 2 meters
> >fregs. are gone, and most sit on one of 2 towers. I don't for see
> >anyone moving them.
> >
> >Plus, if it all works out, in the end the facility will be in our
> >hands, we will control how the design is setup and it most likely be
> >shared with the following operations,
> >
> >1. ARES - us
> >2. CERT - one of our sister groups
> >3. REACT - one of our sister groups
> >4. Search and Rescue - our parent organization which has final say on
> >it all anyways.
> >
> >5. Possible a data transmitter for the County SO office.
> >
> >Other than that, most likely no one will be on the tower. This site
> >will contain both amateur repeaters and a commercial repeater for the
> >SAR organization. But thanks to members of our ARES group and others,
> >we should be able to insure all operations are at their fullest while
> >not hampering any of the others.
>


Reply via email to