Well, within the last year several new PS systems were put on the air using 131.8 Hz. Go figure. :-)
(No, I was not involved with the tone selection or I would have recommended avoiding it - as well as 118.8 and 179.9 Hz.) Joe M. Steve S. Bosshard (NU5D) wrote: > > I just left a 911 Med Dispatch Center - I am pretty sure a kerchunk > every time another user keyed their radio and the TOC falsed their 131.8 > PL would be a major issue. But, if you want to run 131.8 PL on the same > channel with DPL and a turn off code kerchunking the radio every time > they let off the key, go for it...again, not at the same time. > > Keep smiling, > > Steve NU5D > > mch wrote: > > Interesting reply given my statement "Granted, the TOC could false a > > 131.8 Hz decoder" > > > > You're describing a problem that may exist regardless of the dual > > CTCSS/CDCSS encode (the topic of this thread). > > > > Also note that it will still not interfere with each other. There will > > merely be a 'kerchunk' of the 131.8 Hz decoder from the 134 Hz (not 131 > > or 132 Hz) TOC of the CDCSS. > > > > Oh, and it would be just as annoying for hams as for business users. > > > > Joe M. > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
