* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Jul 26 12:14 -0500]:
Thanks for all of your input. I'm learning more as I go along.
I did not get a chance to performance check the RX on site. It just
happened that we were able to stop by the site a week ago and see what
we were up against.
> Having said that, I think Skipp's point is well taken - if the junk is on
> channel, an additional pass cavity
> isn't going to eliminate it. BTW, are you using an isolator on the TX?
Right now, no. There isn't one handy and since there are only a couple
of active hams in the county, I don't know whether they're willing to
plop down a few hundred bucks to try. But, you never know!
There is also some amount of politics involved here as the repeater is
actually owned by the county, as I understand it now.
Fortunately, the interference is not constant nor really consistent.
Hopefully, we can arrange a meet out there again and I can gather more
information and do some tests.
73, de Nate >>
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft
Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @ | free since January 1998.
http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/ | "Debian, the choice of
My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @ | a GNU generation!"
http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/ | http://www.debian.org
