I agree that they are not AUX stations. My point is that currently they are claiming they are since repeater operation where they are operating is clearly prohibited. My additional point was that if they believe what they are saying (and want us to believe), it would not be necessary to change the rules.
In essence, it's an admission of guilt by wanting to change rules they claim they are not in violation of. If you're not in violation, why do you want the change? Joe M. George Henry wrote: > > Read my earlier post under the "Making room for the new guy..." thread as to > why their belief that they are aux stations is false. > > 73, > > George, KA3HSW > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "MCH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 12:15 PM > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all > repeaters as repeaters > > > Actually, if you read that it is not contradictory to the NFCC's letter. > > There is actually a similar motion within the NFCC to similarly expand > > the repeater sub-band. > > > > Their proposal is interesting, however. If they believe they are AUX > > stations, no petition is required - AUX operation is legal there now. > > > > Joe M. > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
