At 9/21/2007 22:46, you wrote: >I agree that they are not AUX stations. My point is that currently they >are claiming they are since repeater operation where they are operating >is clearly prohibited. My additional point was that if they believe what >they are saying (and want us to believe), it would not be necessary to >change the rules. > >In essence, it's an admission of guilt by wanting to change rules they >claim they are not in violation of. If you're not in violation, why do >you want the change?
Who wants to change the rules? Bob NO6B
