Bruce,

I have a 146.04/64 repeater and for years have noticed weak signals roaming in 
the bottom part of 146.  I had thought it was from cable, but have not been 
able to verify or locate.  

A local 146.67 repeater has the most server problem with a weak signal opening 
its receiver often (it is not toned).

73, ron, n9ee/r



>From: lpcoates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 2007/11/09 Fri PM 11:01:32 CST
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Possible interference on 146.160

>                  
>Hi
>
>Our radio club has a portable repeater on 146.760 (-).  Each time we 
>install it on a commercial building we find what appears to be 
>interference on or very near the input frequncy of 146.160.  This 
>repeater was installed at two private homes for several weeks each and 
>worked flawlessley.  Tonight it began to act up after just a few 
>minutes.  Another repeater was tried at one of these commercial sites 
>and it also appeared to be receiving interference on 146.160.  Tonight 
>I tried a simple test of tuning my hand held to 146.160 and found 
>several "hot spots" in the room where I picked up something as well as 
>picking up something radiating from the electrical conduit.  Both of 
>the commercial sites have elevator equipment, one quite old and one 
>very modern.  One site hosts several other radio systems from 400 MHz 
>to 10 GHz and the other site has not other radio equipment.  Both 
>buildings are 12 story office buildings.
>
>My question is, have other people found that this frequency is 
>especially prone to interference from nearby electrical and electronic 
>equipment?  I know that the output frequency of 146.760 can be a 
>problem because it's very close to the 41nd harmonic of the colorburst 
>crystal, but I haven't been able to find any mention of problems on the 
>input frequency of 146.160.
>
>Thanks
>
>Bruce - VE5BNC
>
>            


Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.


Reply via email to