I think the main problem is TOO MANY REPEATERS :-) I've got a good antenna
where I'm at and can hit every repeater in a 75-100 mile radius. as part of
my hunting for a pair, I checked EVERY VHF repeater that I found in the K1IW
database in a 100 mile radius.. About 30% were dead (not responding to key
up with a courtesy tone.. but they may not have had courtesy tones turned
on), and maybe 2-3 dozen of the rest actually with traffic on them.. Call it
about 1 repeater per city/club in the area that was actually getting used.
The sample was taken between 4pm and 7pm (drive time) over a couple of
weeks, though I didn't spend more than 30 minutes (less if I heard traffic)
on any given repeater so I could have missed something. 

 

I've got 4 repeaters listed In my county. only one gets any serious use, the
other is dead except as a C3 channel for ARES and Weather Nets, and one
other has a small group that uses it pretty exclusively.. the 4th is on the
air, but inactive.

 

People just don't have much to talk about with people too far away from
them, pointing up the fact that repeaters are mostly social gathering
places, and its not interesting to socialize with people you don't really
know :-)

 

I guess I'm as bad as anyone though. I stick to one repeater, monitor one
other but rarely talk on it (just a couple of people there that I talk to,
and they aren't on much), and ignore the rest of the repeaters around :-)

 

 

 

  _____  

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony L.
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 9:59 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked Repeater Systems vs. Stand Alone
Repeaters

 

Our club operates a RF full-time linked repeater system in metro New 
York City, currently comprised of four (4) repeaters. We've observed 
that the addition of a new repeater into the system doesn't always 
equate to added usage. In fact, we've noticed that many of the linked 
systems in metro NYC typically aren't as busy as local area stand alone 
systems.

We're puzzled as to why people seem to shy away from most, but not all, 
of the very wide coverage area systems. The busiest repeaters in our 
area seem to be the "no frills" stand alones. Are voice IDs, courtesy 
tones, and coverage footprints beyond a 25-mile radius just more than 
people can handle nowadays?

Comments anyone?

 

Reply via email to