Hi Dave, 

Throw the "Superior" comments out the window... both the 
MSR-2000 and Mastr II base - repeater stations are very nice 
units, quite different from each other but in many cases 
doing the same functions. 

If your MSR-2000 is the mid split version as indicated by 
your specific model number... it will tune down and operate 
well into the 2-Meter ham band without modifications. Depending 
on the specific power amplifier with your repeater/base... you 
should reduce the power output down to about 60% of normal 
operation. If you have a very busy system drop the RF Output 
level to about 45 watts and enjoy your repeater. 

If you have the high range vhf MSR-2000 Repeater the retune for 
operation into the 145 MHz Amateur Band is possible but not very 
practical. The two big issues in the way are the receiver 
pre-selector (front-end) and the rf power amplifier. I have 
converted a high split pa down using parts from a Mitrek Mobile 
for parts... but the process was very time consuming and not 
much fun. 

Ebay retail value of a VHF MSR-2000 on Ebay is about $100 to 
$350 depending on condition. Some places they're found at scrap
value and other locations they like the Mastr II can be found 
at full boat surplus retail heading well up toward the $1k price. 
Just depends on how bad you want one... 

Yep, there's a demand for them... in both Amateur and Commercial 
Applications.  

cheers,
skipp 

skipp025 at yahoo.com 


> "N0ATH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Gentlemen; 
> I recently acquired a pair of MSR 2000 100 watt
> repeaters that are on 160 mhz. I am not very well 
> acquainted with the Motorola gear although every
> one assures me they are far superior to the Mastr II 
> gear I am presently using - My question is, can the 
> 160 mhz units be moved to 146 with out a lot of 
> trouble or at all? These are operational units, one is
> new and one used - If they cannot handily be moved
> to the amateur freq then are they of very much value
> or I guess I should ask, is there any demand for them?
> Thanks / NĂ˜ATH Dave
>


Reply via email to