How could it be more sensitive with CTCSS? I'm not sure I understand. de N5ZTW
----- Original Message Follows ----- From: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ in Waco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:41:09 -0500 > I am curious why anyone in modern times wants to use > carrier squelch? All radios I have seen for years had > ctcss standard. Also I am in Texas and the Texas VHF-FM > society our coordinator agency frowns on carrier squelch > on vhf and does not allow it on uhf. I find ctcss much > more sensitive than carrier squelch. Just wondering? > WB5OXQ > > > >
