Re: SADL or EPLRS Hi John,
You MIGHT be able to find the contact person for the system. Probably your first task... followed by trying to open a very, very friendly dialog with said person(s). Advise them they are able to operate their EPLRS System below 420 MHz where the interference would be less to BOTH parties. A sidebar question of user authority in the band is based on emission designators. Although the Military may be a primary user in the band, their operation as the primary user does not include the type of emissions (emission designation) output from an EPLRS system. Depending on which wind-mill you want to chase... a case can be presented where the EPLRS emissions are secondary to Amateur operation and the resultant interference is a secondary service, which you could request be relocated. The only real world fix is to find the right person(s), provide reasons why their relocation down the band would be prudent and hope like hell they are reasonable. With the proper politics information and attitude you might have some luck (like I/we did). Then along cave Pave Paws... EPLRS will sound like a popping noise in your repeater receiver. good luck s. > "WD7F - John in Tucson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It appears that we (mouse in pocket etal) have SADL/EPLRS problems on a few > UHF machines here in Tucson. Anybody had any dealings with this government > muti agency system causing problems? > > SADL: Situation Awareness Digital Linking > EPLRS: Enhanced Position Pocation Reporting System > > We have A-10s and EC-130s here and many other agencies that probably are > using this stuff in the 430 - 450 MHz range. > > I get the feeling that I've opened a can of worms. > > de WD7F > John in Tucson >
