> >In the past I've actually routed the shielded CTCSS endode
> >audio source wire through chassis and cabinet/box holes
> >and in this case I used the feed through-capacitor method.
 
> Yes, but if you run a wire into a box through a hole, you 
> might as well take the lid off too, as that wire will act 
> just like a coupling probe between the boxes. 

Depends on how the wires are done... I understand what 
you're trying to convey... but it's not been a problem/issue 
in this example. 

> > > >The Hamtronics Receiver COR/COS output is active high, 
> > > > which I don't like one bit.

> Oops - that should have been "...I used active low COS as 
> well."  I also used active low CTCSS, but I still do today - 
> that never changed because the RLC-1 controller only works 
> with active low CTCSS.

In cases where I run into active high logic... I change them 
to active low before they leave the box for the big world. I've 
run into a number of Ham devices (the above mentioned Hamtronics 
Receiver and the CAT Auto RLS/RBS-1000 unit) with active high 
logic and it's just more sane to convert everything over. 

> >I like active low logic for a number of reasons and personal
> >preference. In a situation where the controlling device loses
> >power, there is a potential for the transmitter to key up.
 
> If the RX loses power, the logic outputs could pull to ground 
> as well - depends on the design.  In my case, using opposing 
> polarities on COS & CTCSS appears to eliminate the possibility 
> of both becoming spuriously valid.

If power goes away... the active low device normally would 
stay high impedance (high isolated state) and I can be more 
easily assured the trailing controller remains in a resting 
state. 

> >For this project... I only used the feed-through capacitors
> >for everything. The wires at the rear of the controller get
> >into the controller via a DB-9 plug but nothing on the chassis
> >or RF deck. I stopped using small Anderson Power Pole connectors
> >because of all the grief they caused me on the commercial
> >radio side of my life. A lot of people like and use them but
> >I don't trust or use them anymore after a few 10 hour days
> >sourced back to intermittent small power-pole connectors.
> 
> Uh oh, I hope I don't run into that problem.  I began to 
> standardize on the PowerPole a few years ago & have about 
> 80% of my equipment converted.  Before that I direct-wired 
> everything, but that just got too painful every time I needed 
> to swap something out.  For a short time I started using 
> Molex but the current rating of the easily-obtainable 
> versions was only 8 A - not enough even when doubled up.

Some people seem to have decent results with the Power-poles... 
and I can and do sometimes use them in legacy (already 
installed) situations... but I have my own way of ensuring 
they don't go intermittent, which I don't apply/use in the 
commercial radio world. I don't normally like or use Molex 
connectors for any serious current requirement. 

> Up to now the only negative comments I've heard regarding 
> the PowerPole are related to their non-locking nature. I've 
> found their inherent retention force to be more than 
> sufficient for all my applications, both repeater & 
> mobile.  I know that PowerPoles (& probably almost all other 
> DC connectors) are NOT designed to be hot-mated, which could 
> cause contact problems.  Sometimes it's unavoidable, but 
> I try to prevent it whenever I can.

I just end up removing them from the path and do as much 
direct wire as possible. I haven't had to revisit a cranky 
intermittent power-pole since. 

> >Unless I'm sure there's going to be a lot of shear RF at the
> >repeaters location... I take the simple and easy route. Even
> >with a broadcast station nearby (but not in the same value)
> >I didn't feel the advanced filtering techniques were required
> >and so far, so good.
> 
> When I box a RX, it's usually because I'm having an 
> interference problem due to insufficient shielding.  So 
> I want to be darn sure I don't have to do it again.
> Bob NO6B

This example used a supplied bare receiver and transmitter 
boards. I put them in to acceptable boxes and wired things 
up. Lo and behold it all works very well and I'm on to the 
next cluster _______ .  

I'll hopefully be posting part 3 of this saga in the near 
future. 

Smell the Dayton Brats (Brauts) defrosting... 

cheers,
s. 

Reply via email to