Thanks Jim for the correct "Skinny" re. the ASTRO Spectra. Hopefully they will 
come down in price. But, if they are a disirable radio, I suppose the asking 
price will continue to be quite high (For a while). 



73 Tim 

W7TRH/AFA0TP 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Cicirello" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, October 2, 2009 11:25:55 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: ARRL Approves Study Committee to Research & 
Develop Plan for Narrowband Channel Spacing 

  







Tim, 

You are correct. The regular run of the mill Spectra sells for about $100.00 
and is not narrow band capable. There are many Astro Spectras that do many 
modern things such as digital, but used are about $600.00. 



73 JIM   KA2AJH  





From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of afa5tp 
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 2:07 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: ARRL Approves Study Committee to Research & 
Develop Plan for Narrowband Channel Spacing 








I was under the impression that the "Astro Spectra" was capable of "Narrow 
Band" operation. 

Tim Hardy 
W7TRH/AFA0TP 

--- In [email protected] , "Jim Cicirello" <ka2...@...> wrote: 
> 
> We must look far beyond the repeater that we narrow band. What about the 
> linked systems? We would no longer be able to use the favorite Maxtrac or 
> Radius for Link Radios as there is no narrow band kits available. Thousands 
> of these units will be taken out of commercial use, and I was looking 
> forward to getting this equipment for ham use. Then there is the popular 
> Spectra that many of us are using for Mobile and Base Radios in the ham 
> band. They are Superior to the ham grade radios in selectivity, audio, etc, 
> but again they will not narrow band. Let's not loose site that this decision 
> will cost us big bucks above and beyond the price of Narrow Banding the 
> repeater to keep our systems going. 
> 
> 
> 
> Comments please..Jim KA2AJH 
> 
> 
> 
> From: [email protected] 





Reply via email to