using pure discriminator audio perhaps? --- On Mon, 10/19/09, Michael Ryan <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Michael Ryan <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] kendecom repeaters on 220 To: [email protected] Date: Monday, October 19, 2009, 1:06 AM Hello Bob, Well..I know you would know what a good machine should sound like. You have worked a few I know! Steve, W4YHD had done some audio tailoring within the unit but just what I could not say. But I know it has been on the air with nary a glitch for a quarter century or more. In fact I would say that his repeater has been the most reliable machine in our club all the years I lived up there. And it is still going strong. - Mike From: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:Repeater- buil...@yahoogro ups.com] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 11:45 PM To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] kendecom repeaters on 220 At 10/18/2009 19:17, you wrote: >The repeater there in Fairfax, Va on 224.100 has the best audio of any >repeater I ever heard. It is a Kendecom. I dare anyone to tell me that >they can tell the difference between the INPUT audio and the OUTPUT >audio. Very natural, unprocessed, and a pleasure to listen to. - Mike Wondering what you did to it to make it sound so good. Every one I've heard around here sounds very restricted & somewhat distorted. In fact, I can usually tell if a repeater is a Kendecom by the characteristically poor repeat audio. Bob NO6B __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4520 (20091018) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset. com
