John is the inputs Capacitor coupled? And or are the RX sources DC coupled?  

Randy

--- In [email protected], "John Transue" <jtran...@...> wrote:
>
> Our club recently added a remote receiver and RF link to our club
> repeater. We are using an ACC RC-850 controller at the repeater site.
> We added an LDG RVS-8 voter so we would not have to use PL and to make
> life easier for mobile users. 
> 
> Now we have a problem. When I set up the voter, the POTs that I must
> adjust seem to have step functions, i.e. I can adjust to, say, 500 mV,
> then the next slightest adjustment will immediately take me to, say, 3
> V. I put the two receivers on channels 1 and 2 and found the step
> occurred in both channels. This was perplexing. I called LDG tech
> support and was told that maybe a POT was just dirty even though the
> voter is brand new. So I tried again with the same result. Then I
> switched the two receivers to channels 3 and 4. These POTs had the
> same characteristic. There are two POTs per channel, so the problem is
> there for eight POTs! At first blush, this looks as though LDG has a
> large supply of defective POTs. 
> 
> So my question is, "Is there any way something external to the voter
> could cause the voter POTs to behave this way?" I don't want to charge
> LDG with using bad components if there is any chance that the problem
> is caused by our receivers or controller. I don't see any way the
> receivers or controller could cause the problem. What do you all
> think?
> 
> John
> AF4PD
> 
> PS: The repeater receiver is in a Midland BaseTech II and the link
> receiver is an Icom IC-F221S.
> PPS: A further problem is that the maximum audio output of the RVS-8
> is not adequate to modulate the BaseTech II transmitter (through the
> RC-850) to any deviation above 1.7 kHz. I can solve this with an audio
> amplifier or a change to the RC-850, but I would rather that the voter
> did the job. This problem, too, could be caused by a bad POT. I am
> sorry to say I did not measure the audio voltage out of the voter.
>


Reply via email to