The few hams I've talked to, say "well, the frequencies aren't ours anyway, so the FCC can do whatever they want with them. So, given that attitude, I'm not surprised that few are commenting.
Richard www.n7tgb.net The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money --Margaret Thatcher _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kris Kirby Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 2:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] fcc violation notice??? On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, Bill Smith wrote: > Recon Scout is one that just received FCC approval for video in the > 439 MHz area. I know about the Recon Scout. My name is all over the FCC's comments system rebutting the manufacturer's attorney. I'm at a bit of a loss as to why more amateurs aren't getting involved in trying to stop this misuse of spectrum. Even when the FCC makes an order, the affected users have a right to petition for reconsideration. I'm wondering if the device below is a Recon Scout, or if it is a device by another manufacturer. > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Kirk Just Kirk wrote: > > For some odd reason POLICE DEPTS. think they are exempt from any > > frequency co-ordination!! There is one Law Enforcement agency here in > > Las Vegas that has a "Robot" device that receives it's commands on > > 154.570Mhz !!! WHAT THE HELL WERE THEY THINKING???? This freq is > > MURS-4, it's unlicensed, but it IS a licensed channel used by damn > > near every fast food eatery for it's drivethru window!! Can you > > possibly think of a poorer choice of RF freq to control a Robot on???? > > Dont get me started on the fact they use 439.250Mhz for the Video > > feeds!!! besides it being used for HAM ATV it's a very common cable TV > > channel!! > > What manufacturer makes this robotic device? -- Kris Kirby, KE4AHR Disinformation Analyst
