That's my take, but someone on here insisted otherwise based on testing he 
had done. I spoke with an electrical engineer who said the same thing, but 
then he wondered out loud if it could be possible if the power factor was 
shifted to an extreme with a spinning disk meter. He opined that an 
electronic meter wouldn't be "fooled." Of course shifting the PF to an 
extreme would be a basis for utility company action.

Chuck
WB2EDV


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gary Schafer" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 9:06 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Adding capacitors to lower electric bill


> You won't see any difference. The electric meter reads true power not VA.
>
> 73
> Gary  K4FMX
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:Repeater-
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck Kelsey
>> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 8:00 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Adding capacitors to lower electric bill
>>
>> A while back, maybe a year or two ago, there was a discussion on here
>> where
>> a list member had success adding a capacitor to his electric service 
>> which
>> reduced his bill. It was debated for a while.
>>
>> Anyway, I am wondering if the utility company ever came and replaced the
>> spinning disk meters with electronic versions, and if so, what the 
>> outcome
>> was.
>>
>> Could the original poster respond either here or privately? I just today
>> had
>> a similar discussion with another ham who tried essentially the same 
>> thing
>> with no success - only his was a commercial model, so it cost him
>> considerably more.
>>
>> Chuck
>> WB2EDV
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3084 - Release Date: 08/20/10 
14:35:00

Reply via email to