Joonas Kylmälä wrote: > >> So it gives global i.e. public ipv6 address. > > I think it was pretty clear from the context that I was referring to > > IPv4. > > This shouldn't matter. I can test IPv4 in two weeks. It does matter, instead. While IPv6 addresses are usually assigned in a globally-unique way, that's not the case with IPv4, where most infrastructures heavily rely on NAT'ing, hence giving devices behind a router/AP a private address (i.e. 192.168.x.x or 10.x.x.x).
> I appreciate the work you have done and I'm not trying to make it any > more less for just the sake of it. I'm doing code review so we can have > easily maintainable and well working Replicant OS. Ok that's fine. That's my purpose too. Let me explain: I felt a bit pressed by your insistent way of pointing out things for which I had already given an answer/explanation. But that's ok. Maybe I over-reacted. Let's get on together on common goals! Be fine, Fil
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Replicant mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/replicant
