> The third form leads to a flat repository structure, similar to > that in use by maven (http://www.ibiblio.org/maven) > >From a browsing perspective, this doesn't scale to large numbers > of groups (aka products).
That could be said about anything, at any level. Luckily Apache (this repository) isn't SourceForge, our product groups/artefacts are within scale. I think one could argue about almost any arbitrary hierarchy, with pros and cons. I don't think we should start there phase one. I say we keep it simple, and fix it only if we find it broken. regards Adam
