> The third form leads to a flat repository structure, similar to
> that in use by maven (http://www.ibiblio.org/maven)
> >From a browsing perspective, this doesn't scale to large numbers
> of groups (aka products).
That could be said about anything, at any level. Luckily Apache (this
repository) isn't SourceForge, our product groups/artefacts are within
scale. I think one could argue about almost any arbitrary hierarchy, with
pros and cons. I don't think we should start there phase one. I say we keep
it simple, and fix it only if we find it broken.