2009/6/25 Iain Duncan <iaindun...@telus.net>:
> For me personally (admittedly a totally new user to zope/repoze) it's a
> negative to have bfg moving to share fewer components with Pylons, as
> one of the main attractions to me of bfg is it's complementary nature to
> pylons. And conversely, one of the turn offs for me re Django as the
> rampant not-invented-here aspect.

Perhaps what Chris is cooking up could be split up into a separate
package; it seems to me that the motivation is that the Routes
implementation could be improved upon, both in terms of performance
and code quality. I could be wrong.

Repoze-dev mailing list

Reply via email to