On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 11:56 +0200, Malthe Borch wrote: > 2009/6/25 Iain Duncan <iaindun...@telus.net>: > > For me personally (admittedly a totally new user to zope/repoze) it's a > > negative to have bfg moving to share fewer components with Pylons, as > > one of the main attractions to me of bfg is it's complementary nature to > > pylons. And conversely, one of the turn offs for me re Django as the > > rampant not-invented-here aspect. > > Perhaps what Chris is cooking up could be split up into a separate > package; it seems to me that the motivation is that the Routes > implementation could be improved upon, both in terms of performance > and code quality. I could be wrong.
That's an intriguing possibility. I've been working on a wsgi-only admin app and was trying to figure out how to do the dispatching. Reading the repoze docs, I think the way I was imagining the design to flesh it out is somewhere between pylons-routes controllers and zope style traversal to views. This dispatch tool might be very useful for such a scenario. Or I may just do the thing in repoze and drop it into pylons projects, lots of reading to do first. Anyway, great mailing list and tutorials. Iain _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
